Welcome to the last installment in a series of posts about the popular framework AngularJS. This series is designed to help you avoid common traps and pitfalls before they become a problem.
The top five mistakes I see people make are:
- Heavy reliance on $scope (not using controller as)
- Abusing $watch
- Overusing $broadcast and $emit
- Hacking the DOM
- Failing to Test
Is failing to test really a problem with Angular, or a programming philosophy in general? I think it’s a little bit of both, and in this post I’ll explain why.
Failing to Test
If you’re not sure what testing has to do with Angular, take a look at their own developer guide entry for unit testing. I’ll just quote the following:
Angular is written with testability in mind, but it still requires that you do the right thing.
That’s a pretty clear directive (some of you see what I did there). First, I’d like to walk through how Angular embraces testing. Then, I’ll explore why it matters and how it’s not just a philosophical decision when you’re building large Angular apps. Then I’ll wrap with some final thoughts. If that works for you, keep reading.
Angular = Testing
I am pretty confident with that statement. Let’s explore the facts:
- The framework was written to be testable
- Dependency injection is a large part of the framework and helps make unit testing easier
- Karma was written specifically to make running tests easier
- Angular provides a module called ngMock right out of the box to make testing easier by injecting and mocking services such as $http
- Protractor. Seriously.
So What?
Some of you will say, “So what?” Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should, right? Fortunately, most of my decisions in programming are pragmatic and based on real world experience, not hypothetical pontification. I’ve not only worked on Angular projects that didn’t have tests, or other projects that did have tests, but have the experience of being on large projects that started without tests and then introduced them so I have a pretty good idea of the impact.
And it’s all positive.
There are some obvious benefits of tests you’ll hear thrown around like:
- Find defects as early as possible (haven’t you heard, bugs are more expensive to fix in production?)
- Refactoring assistance – don’t you feel better about changing code when you know you can run some tests to figure out the side effects right away?
- Automated regression – as your application evolves, the tests make it easier to determine how your code base is keeping up with the changes
For me, though, the real benefits of testing aren’t so obvious until you’ve experienced them firsthand.
Requirements Refinement
Believe it or not, a good testing strategy can improve the quality of your requirements. This is essential when you are managing a large application. In fact, one of my favorite projects involved a collaborative feedback loop between the business, testers, and coders (you know, that “agile thing”) and helped really refine requirements to something usable.
We made it simple: when defining a backlog item, there would be testable acceptance criteria. We’d work with the team to ensure that criteria really could translate to a test.
So, you might start with something like this:
“Given a user when they enter their information then the system should calculate some fitness data.”
Not a very good requirement, is it? We could get more specific and state,
“Given a user when they enter their information then the system should compute their basal metabolic rate.”
That’s better, but I still can’t write a test. How about a few examples? Here’s one that is specific:
“Given a 40-year old 5 ft. 10 in. male who weighs 200 pounds when BMR is calculated then should compute 1929.”
Wow! Now that I can write a test for. In fact, I did write one you can execute here and it looks like this:
describe("Formula for BMR", function () {
describe("Given a 40-year old 5 ft 10 in male who weighs 200 pounds",
function () {
it("should compute a BMR of 1929",
function () {
var actual = formulaBmr({
isMale: true,
height: 70,
weight: 200,
age: 40
});
expect(actual).toEqual(1929);
});
});
});
Of course I added a few other scenarios. Having requirements with explicit acceptance criteria that translate directly to tests will completely transform how you deliver enterprise software.
API Design
The second impact of testing is that it directly impacts the design of your API. I’m not talking about afterthought, after-the-fact tests you write just so you can check a box that says, “I wrote tests.” I’m talking true test-driven development (TDD) that involves writing the test first, watching it fail, then writing the simplest piece of code you can to satisfy the test. You should try it sometime. It takes a lot of patience at first to change the way you approach it, but I found it creates clean, readable, maintainable code.
In the example above, for example, I originally had an interface that took several parameters for the calculation. I quickly realized it wasn’t evident looking at the call what was being passed or even what order. So I updated the API to take a parameter object instead with clearly defined labels (in hindsight I should have been even more explicit and made it heightInches and weightPounds).
That resulted in writing a service that looks like this:
function formulaBmr(profile) {
// Women - 655 + (4.35 x weight in pounds) + (4.7 x height in inches) - (4.7 x age in years)
function woman(weight, height, age) {
return Math.floor(655 + (4.35 * weight) + (4.7 * height) - (4.7 * age)); }
// Men - 66 + (6.23 x weight in pounds) + (12.7 x height in inches) - (6.8 x age in years )
function man(weight, height, age) {
return Math.floor(66 + (6.23 * weight) + (12.7 * height) - (6.8 * age)); }
return profile.isMale ? man(profile.weight, profile.height, profile.age) :
woman(profile.weight, profile.height, profile.age); }
Notice it’s a standalone, clean JavaScript object I could use in any application. It only becomes “Angularized” when I register it with dependency injection:
(function (app) {
app.factory('formulaBmrService',
function () {
return formulaBmr;
});
})(angular.module('healthApp'));
In fact, following a test-driven approach almost always results in clean, modular, portable code. In many cases I find that 80% of the code isn’t tied to a specific framework but exists as domain objects that perform certain tasks, and only get pulled into a framework to resolve dependencies and participate in data-binding.
Program Design
Testing does more than just improve API design. When I set out to build a 6502 emulator, I had no idea where to begin. So, I started writing tests to make the CPU do what I wanted. The CPU wouldn’t really do much without software to make it run, and most example programs for the 6502 8-bit chip are written in assembly language that must be compiled to machine code. To make this happen I wrote a set of compiler specs so I could load programs and test them in the emulator. Eventually I got the emulator up and running. To see it in action, simply load a sample program, compile, then run it.
Tests can help drive the design of your overall app, and that’s exactly how I wrote the emulator.
Documentation
The final not-so-obvious advantage to tests is that they document the system. If you’re not sure how “op codes” work for the 6502 chip, just take a look at the op code tests. It should be clear what the various labels stand for, what their function is, and what the expected result is for various operations. Even end users can read well-written test specifications and understand how a system is supposed to work.
It doesn’t stop there! Developers can read the source code of the specs to determine how the various APIs work. The example I linked to demonstrates the various flags that exist in the 6502 CPU and how they operate. A test can therefore drive design at multiple levels, provide documentation of requirements, and demonstrate exactly how to consume the components of the system.
Test-Driven Development
TDD is an approach that requires discipline, patience, and most importantly buy-in to implement if your team does not already embrace it. Even if you decide you do not want to follow a TDD approach, I strongly encourage you to make testing a part of your development lifecycle. Don’t just write tests to check a box or make a code coverage number, but instead integrate them as part of a meaningful approach to reap the benefits I’ve listed.
One technique I found is useful for adopting tests is to take a two-fold approach. The first is with requirements. Ensure requirements contain acceptance criteria that is specific enough to write tests for, and if you write no other tests, at least write the tests that will satisfy acceptance criteria.
Another way to integrate testing is through your defects resolution cycle. If a bug is entered into the system, the first step should be to write a test that fails because of the bug. You won’t believe how effective this simple approach can be if you aren’t already following it.
First, being able to duplicate the bug requires that you are able to gather enough information to reproduce it. This places the onus on your testing team to collect the information you need. It also requires intimate knowledge of the code so you know what components to write the test against that cause the failure. If you find it is difficult to write tests for the majority of bugs, you might need to take a step back and assess your architecture. The same design that makes it difficult to test could be contributing to the instability that is causing defects to surface in the first place.
Creating the test helps you get more familiar with the code that is related to the defect, and also creates a baseline for preventing future defects. Once you have a failing test, you can work to modify the code so the test passes. After it passes you can pass on the fix with confidence it was properly addressed, and slowly build a test suite that ensures the defects don’t reappear as side effects to later changes.
If you want an example of a full test-driven development cycle to build a reference application, check out my post entitled Let’s Build an Angular App! The deck will walk you through a series of github commits that represent an app that was written with a test-driven approach. You can see it evolve and watch how I took simple steps to layer components together that ultimately contributed to the final result.
That’s All He Wrote!
I saved this post for last because I believe the first 4 mistakes are actually easier to avoid when you take a test-driven approach. The Angular practices I’ve picked up over the past few years are based on hands-on experience architecting systems to scale with large teams and make it easy to integrate new features. When the team is focused on a test-driven approach, they tend to create solutions that:
- Avoid $scope when it’s not needed because it’s easier to test properties and methods on a plain old JavaScript object (POJO)
- Don’t require the overhead of extraneous $watch because they are architected based on states and transitions
- Communicate between controllers without depending on hierarchy or the DOM
- Maintain state and logic in code that can be tested without the presence of a browser or a DOM because it connects via data-binding and directives rather than explicit manipulation
As you can see, the top 5 mistakes are really all related! I hope this series helped improve your approach to providing business solutions with Angular. Let me know your thoughts and please feel free to add any of your own tips or common mistakes in the comments below! I look forward to hearing from you and appreciate all of you who have contributed your questions, thoughts, suggestions and tips to my previous posts in this series.
![signature[3]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0wuRt5OEpG7Ix8pTHfifofWzH2fBLNN-bFBtWzrmq2kX_DoxqALmOK6lg4-9nl36EzQMUKO0883R0uSTHcrsKT_TIlPOTeodxNQfSvlDRJkxdLjW-nIBEFs36-uiohNDN8ouGcA8VZUKx/s1600-h/signature%25255B3%25255D%25255B3%25255D.gif "signature[3]"){kind=small}
![signature[1]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjg01CgsUXWiwTbMENoOGA2eb2YUUI0DhKiQaN5Uvlj_EwRxYPMkkbg8btNPD1kV_JuzKXctWbWkLEOHSuwUQ-g4MhcIZPlZodPOkD_MceqaFwULMLjLq7vLGf7geJoaumu9D6xFvnl4mut/s1600-h/signature%25255B1%25255D%25255B3%25255D.gif "signature[1]"){kind=small}
![signature[1]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjH_kDFmdcvDZdfwCe9wa1fR4REhemx7olNH15u2dhhbwK7EPxG3zMrTK07gv9AVVSVFxtkjpcp-tMXuDsPsSVlVwPASvY6GfbzVooHLW1zAao_OHdnSb7P6AWGzF2tc-5ZkiYvY5KMWAvf/s1600-h/signature13.gif "signature[1]"){kind=small}
![signature[1]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyyPcnMpMVYzbl2lqd8Xktbcc2CYdV_bzMB8zi9m0V7eABoFhfmIaihjhuNt3OArnA3wp4DnftZEJC_EzrF_tda8sdK9dVoReTPYBMt4Sz9t8rLEtZaLC9dGD66uhy7Xn1U1MxEKnJv9i8/s1600-h/signature%25255B1%25255D%25255B3%25255D.gif "signature[1]"){kind=small}
![main[1]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhp97Se2yvckzE8QCHcPae01glJCUGCMK44vzpAkuotoLl_LTB8UomZ_3qHnKyCQkNeTnMjf3Q3Oe-J2_tBNC_XlMiWTMB4Xf4NNKwnS7ufLyzUZ7k9U7LV-6Fx4qIOLGr4r9mdXfW3Whwp/s1600-h/main%25255B1%25255D%25255B7%25255D.png "main[1]")
![signature[1]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrctB0miKCHElhwH_QcWpjoDUWtxDc5UcMFlET6qyaLAj_HPT7U2db-Ol4qhXtKRbnopPb_h5e1dkmKXQl_adkMmV_2Jvp0AihOSN0AYcDXjarO48uAi_5-F4swVWPoEy-uKHrN4SId1_R/s1600-h/signature%25255B1%25255D%25255B3%25255D.gif "signature[1]"){kind=small}